Knot too

B 3 D...

The context ... 
somewhere embedded in(~) the rational?

(~) Monday Morning Rally...,  Hegelian Rationality?, Neo-changian?

4-1-15 update of sorts :
Not to be 3~D.
The Transformational Israeli-Saudi Alliance
Poll: Republicans See Obama as More Imminent Threat Than Putin
Obama Is Not Anti-War

The day of the Elephant?

Democracy is... [?]
The table ... ?

The point to be* illuminated later**.
There are other tusky references in the works. 

[ ? : A. Too Random..., B. What the Beck?, C. hmmm?, D. Saber Rattling]
... "the worst form of government"
De "form of worship"?

*2B: Hegelian Rationality? , Para~graph Three! ?
tusky:  a., b.Original Intent , c., d., e. The %th EleFont

**  my comment @
 

The TPP seems to be similar to the Iran nuclear negotiations in its secrecy.
Now there are leaks or portions of what are on the table being used to argue against what is generally the responsibility of the administration; foreign policy.
Could it be that opposition from the left on this is as off base as opposition from the right on almost everything President Obama has tried?
...

Not that I support anything where the fine print is withheld from the public, couldn't this fit within the general progress that the Administration has achieved despite concerns over words like compromise and moderation? [...]

Tusk! (Divide to conquer?, Work in Progress, CPS, Fight On!, It's Obama's Turn)
O W ?

4-1-15 Update.
 

New Clear

Much ado about nature? 

Chicken, Egg or New Clear? A new meaning for the acronym MAD! Aside from the feeling one gets when reading such things, it could be Mutually Assured Deterioration. It seems like the N'th time's the charm. Maybe there is a call for this type of clarity so we can be reminded of our own type of regime change, and how change period is a slippery slope up, not the theory that dominoes suggest by being exceptions to the rulers.

Re:clear
Nature~ the course of changing laws.

Old Clear?
Un-Clear !
3-31-15 Update!
4-1-15 Update.

Really To Read

Sometime* ... or later !
Simon Malloy ?
Testing Cruz Control GOP!

* 3-30-15
* Politics is the height of confuse us [!]
[forth amigo?]

Remembering Rorty!

Or is it dis~membering? 

The point?  The Clash?

Unfortunately, links don't last, but that is not the point.  Or maybe that is physics.  The issue is...
Hegelian and Straussian, and maybe Wittgenstinian* and Nietzschian, let alone Manichean.
The point is the ongoing project.  **

* (spell check later)
[Lost in the draft: Crying Neo-Wolf?]
(~) - / - ?

** having now actually read the Rorty piece, I will simply note a Kantian judgement, to be parsed later. 

Lie Bury[!]

Write off the bat, I will reference the heading: 
Books, links, Lay Buried/NFRY.

The inspiration ? 
Openly Secular: Not necessarily.

O~W [!]
(Akin to FP ~ of 6 links)*
Spoiler alert: ala FP? Or legend of sorts...
The (#'s) below are the sequence of inserting above.
The M-beds within are links to blog searches of this blog.**

(4.) April 23rd, Openly Secular Day!
(1.) The Labor Market Conundrum: The Cyclical And The Secular
(2.) What Would Don Draper Do? Reading Dante in a Secular Age
(5.) Document Proclaims Secular Government
(6.) Mullahs and Heretics [!]
(3.) The Godless Delusion*

* Bingo: Started Reading!
** these italics are bibliographing in progress

* 4MAT SHIFT (3-26-15)
The Dig ?  2b Kantinued ?

 

Unity March

Retreading* Charlie Hebdo
Aborting the euphemism. 
Still ... an excuse to file.

It is with trepidation that I have used the CH tragedy as a euphemism for a car wreck/churned media of lede or ship~made ya' look childishness.  Thanks to the Jon Stewart apology in conjunkshun^ with the vehicle/road metaphor(a4 menshunned), not to mention trip~tiring references, I hereby vow to never use CH in vain.  And darned if I didn't spell it correctly, weather it flows or not[!]

A sub-plot to this 4M might be; "are we there yet?" ^^


*retiring

[last down]
(3) we are Charlie
(2) share n' angle Mitt's BO*Son
(~) lost order
(6) SELF DEFEATING TRIBALISM
(8) Obama with Drama
(1) Cruz Hillary Dream
(4) Perlstein Huckabee Apocalypse
(5) Crack Hawks Fund
(7) Hillary media jokes
(11)Stewart apology
(9) of the forth kind
(10) of the fourth kind

^ coin-age
^^ spoiler alert  (re:trip tiring ref) UM? (nor StewArt [!])
(8)~(*)

Obama With Drama

For complete context I will have to read further.

For preemptive context^, is it between the Frost and the Peck?

Recent references?^^
Poetic linkage?

(^) F P
(^^) R. Throwing the Game  / r. Net and Yahoo? , WWW Wisconsin Lesson?





The WhoSure State?

See labels. *











* looking deeper into the quagmire

Re:4th mat ?

[Meanwhile, still digging.  Where did I bury that poetic link?  It may have only been under the italics 2 back.]

AnyHow ... apparently I buried or wove under the nexus** of a brighter side of life.  I must return later to the [...] *** junction?

** bane oar tangent

*** 3-24-15 kantinued post red[!]
Translation: did read.
Path/Road~Frost/Peck to be sorted under Fed oration[!] 
Vulcan/English~Table/Borg \~\
Spock/Nimoy~Idle/Palin Galactic Conference?
Let alone . . . ??[!]

All In

Mo~dem?**
New clear Charlotte?

Post-Obama~ no post-woe man?
Telephone~internet > post all?

Gohmert/Sam Sedar? R'adrenalizing/D'adrenalizing?
Rachel Ma'dow'N!  Camps vs. Draft? ** 
Red cabin/Blue label/Link'on! or lin`COD?
Post-9-11 Kaw'Kuss?
Talk me up!

BTW: Netanyahu pulls an^Obama ?

^ somewhere embedded in his speech(also my posts) is the Frost of the Table.

The Last Word ???? *
[See`DaR for the Trees / The Hillary Kamp / journalists at the gate?]

* thank yaH'way  [Net~n~hu`n?] Richard Wolfe/re:expert! 
Stat'N individual autonomy/sovereignT? The Atlantic SouthEarn Strategy?
Other guest: Canibalize Right Wing Parties? Pivot/Schill!

** may require service/sign-in/ or upgrade

Hegelian Rationality?

HR? Proposed Concept.

For the science religion dichotomy/dilemma. (1-2)
Rationality and irrationality at(3) the same table, and in the same chair.  (shoes/feet/mouth/toss)*
VC: a Virtuous Clog?  P5+1 example.  Cotton pick'n GOP another. 
State of Strauss and the Torah the antithesis? 

Zion is asemantic!

Process proposal?  Kant we... Waltz?

*pundittering additions
(#'d)inserts [ s~r , d/d ]  :: (3) youtube IAM  :: VC vital cognisance? :: State'n Hegel? 
Original aphorism?  (Wit'N Pythagorus)
Lables TBA : T'issue Tan'go?  :: (to be Kantinued)

M-bed F'N:
Strauss :  a. No Teddy , Para~graph Three! , Monday Morning Rally... , Bin(un)Jun'Go , Hegelian Rationality? , Neo-changian? , Relemma'n Leo , Esoteric Relemma[!]
  
RIG^ / SOG subj/obj geometry  : RIG'N progress ~ N = poetics^ / Nietzsche? (tot~ology)
 [ dit , IF,  IW ] ~ lie`bearE? akin to NFR~'Y
Numbers R objective ideal and subjective reality? Cultural conditioning? 25~min.> systemic analysis/
meanfeltic[!] stastical rhetoric?  Meta-Clastic?

Dukes or Hazzards

Or
Perils* of Paul-ien**? 

*NYTimes subscription required or use of your alloted limit:
(in lieu of scroll click) David Brooks ~ Building Better Secularist
**NFRY: reading in progress former(*) embedded in latter(**)

Rather than further annotate or embed links... (dot, dot, dot)
TBS(2 B S...) Fukuyama Strauss
2. ★Re-initialism★ / Mises... / Cultural Threads are Fine. / Neo-Context ?
B. SHOCK and AWE(UPDATE) /\ /, Give 'em a break! //,  Mises... /,  Technical Difficulties  /?/, GOLEFT TV [!]
S.  E A R C H : Flash Back, Fast Forward, Regime Rhetoric Reply, Open Threads.

[or / of rawls ? P'op'e ?]

Shades of Charlie Hebdo?

The E-bomb[!]

(fp!)
Economic
Groove thing. 

The point is embedded in reactionary word play and lede or ship.  Redistribution(the R-word) is the result of economics(the E-word).  Politics has become the (proxy)bad word. 

Hillary Clinton Says 'It Would Have Been Better' to Use Two Email Accounts - NBC News

Hillary Clinton Says 'It Would Have Been Better' to Use Two Email Accounts - NBC News

The Cycle

Addressing the Record or Lack thereof ?
Laws bite, unfortunately they take more than one party. 

"Out of step with the best" poetry.*

* insert at best
C3-PO? / FOX ROMANTIC U.S.

Monday Morning Rally...

...Of the File Nature.

See labels[!]*

*there is reading between the lines and there is not scroll-clicking the hyper links.

[3-10-15 ...'N dot org ? !]^

^(FMuse?) [To pun on footnotes~> and Levi-Strauss.]
[ Strauss:  Neo-changian? ::: Levi? ~ / ~ ? ::: ~> to be adjusted ::: on / Bin(un)Jun'Go ::: pun / Files of the ::: M~kind? ]

and tba 3rd (FN) [ ! =Strauss+changian:  Para~graph Three!   Neo-changian? ::: (?) ^/ ^ ::: org: OurFuture.org ::: dot: Center for American Progress ::: 'N hero/competence? :::  ...  keystone / kids table? ::: 3-10-15 : LOL*regime change* ]
 

Files of the

Third Kind? 
Snowden
War'ren
This pentagonal* file was unintentional but did not just happen.  There was an order in the linking, not that they were the order of the words.*  Inserted this order. 3, 4~5(1, 2) where the ellipsed were from an earlier browse of my in-box, and the last line was furc'8ed by choice.  Not to avoid any CH,  Buffeting, or labelism.  Not to mention, but I guess I am, a lost(~)reference from a counter(~) perspective, speaking of W)~(B . 

(~) not sure which ~)(~
Hint: Monty Python, Life of Brian

*3-6-15  Way off the Mark, but maybe to avoid the X-files, that's not the ticket.  And certainly not Platonic**. The P or point is or maybe the pythagornomics***. 

** OW ~ The irony of p[!] Or is it Pi?  AnyHow, a`tension may have been implied. (3/4)~**

*** coined Word? (P)~(F) ?[!](~) (F`P`?)

 

[Need caption/credit(...)]

Hume or Hegel

(~)^?

Egg-Road-Sky ?



Flat Kind ? 

(~) ?: alt image to be f(R)OWnd

 

 

 

Bin(un)Jun'Go

2 links
in progress.
Steve Smith (watching)in progress. [('n Strauss)!]

Previous reference and reL8ted viewings.

i.p. Fukuyama/Kaplan...

(ReLabelism)
[/] 1. (FP!) , 2. Proof of Life... 3. The Hope
i.p.  1.  ★Re-initialism★ , 2. Mises... , 3. Cultural Threads are Fine. 4.  Neo-Context

March Forth ?  [Lost in the Phrey?]

3-5-15: 1st things (above 'n labels!). 
Lede or Ship? [C-font!] (intro/content/) (heading/goal?)
Bin- parsing of bingo and un-circular file / (un)~Jung or circular / Go~Hegelian [!]
Line 3 some articles and links re: Steve Smith (Straussian?)
L4: PR& Strauss Lectures.

Note: It may not be obvious, but I don't always get back to read everything labeled NFRY or NFR.
While NFR may mean not necessarily needing to, NFRY indicates a hope to.  Then
fortuitus $hits happen.  Like the opening of the last link(LM frying pan), and the parsing of 4-2-it-us?  Not to men shun(A2~?)   [ahhhh! ???] Let alone one liners.*

Now to the^^ point at the mo'ment.  Acon Ference? **

*(FPip)(???)~ The Un-Revolved(~) Thread / (ahhh)~ commercial goat scream / (?)~Jenga / (A2)~et tu / (shun) USCroll click / (men)~[lost or redone'dented] / (to)~Jung& / GnotS

** a file of sorts un red[!]or yetT for 2? (Or tent4text) /~gno-M~BA
Loose unMbeds? O'w[!]? ^
^D'Ribble saved in draft
^^ 2B read and viewed
[ final note !: that's the ticket ? ] ( fp: Still in draft? ) [knot necessarily gunuh]
fur cation?




Saux?(~\~) ow~/~ew what?



That's what!

Net and Yahoo?

No disrespect.
Nor circular wag'N train.
or empty chair ?

[!] It must mean... [!]
[the un-tan'g'ent]

^?~ n ? : x. The New Compendium y. The Billy Club... z. More Gill~Let? [!]

More Gill Let?

More Flex-balls ?
Fertil~ized ?
More Cowbell?

M: Tale of Two Bullies!Tale of Two Bullies!, C:O/ Caging Godzillas , W/ On the level...
F: (*)Carry On Comment!, Perspectivism, The Other Debates, Jeb Bush is full of Cow Pie! , Whistle Blowing in the Dark?, Z: Neo-changian? , (*)Recycling Trash, Here We Go Again, D&R Tan ya?, ?: Too Random...
or: A? Anticipation Project ^, P? Politics Local and National
FB? The Guardian?

[image tbi ] 

more cowbell









[image tbi ]  ( )

[finally/gnot exactly]
[But a D'R win of some de men shun.]






i. Bury the lede?
e. i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy

NFRY~(not fully rel8d yet)
Not 2 B  con`fused ... w/o?
(FN^)  The Other Debates, Perspectivism, Jeb Bush is full of Cow Pie!
oar
o.w. / or Pen ta go(~)'N ?

Let Alone... D(R)N~A ?*
   
* Ctrl F~M-beds @ S. .C 
C-O~W[tbK(o)?] nPS?
WTB ? [!] (.  .  .)